BLACKS vs JEWS

February 13, 2007 at 12:35 am (Uncategorized)

tony_martin.jpgI thought I’d take a moment to honor Professor Tony Martin (right), a hero of truth. 

Martin served as a witness for Ernst Zundel before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal.  He said revisionism is at the very core of the historical profession.  He is also a central figure in the split between Blacks and Jews.  (For convenience, this blog will refer to African-Americans as “Blacks.”)

Let’s review some highlights of that split. Then Martin will be discussed.

NAACP

Early in the 1900s, Jews recognized elements in the black struggle that could benefit Zionism. 

Therefore several Zionist leaders co-founded the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) in Baltimore (1909).  These Zionists included people like Henry Moskowitz, a wealthy Jewish doctor (1875-1936). 

Financing for NAACP came from people like Jacob Schiff: the Rothschild agent who would later help to finance the Bolsheviks, and help to finance both sides in World War I.  Schiff also helped set up the U.S. Federal Reserve and Internal Revenue Service, both in 1913.

For the next sixty-six years, the presidents of the NAACP were all Zionist Jews.  The NAACP’s highest honor, the Spingarn Medal, was named after Joel Spingarn, a Jewish professor at Columbia University.  (In 1975, the NAACP finally got its first Black chairman upon the death of chairman Kivie Kaplan, a Boston Jew).

Between World War I and I, the NAACP focused on stopping the lynching of Blacks.  By the late 1950s and early 1960s, Blacks began to struggle for equal rights. 

Prominent groups in this struggle included …

–The Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee
–The Congress of Racial Equality
–The Southern Christian Leadership Conference (led by Martin Luther King). 

Jews provided 75% of the funding for these groups.  

Stanley Levison (Jew) wrote speeches for Martin Luther King.  He also handled King’s finances, and acted as King’s strategist.  Levison was one of King’s two closest advisors (the other being Andrew Young).

Meanwhile Jews began to teach “African American Studies” in academia.  Most of their students were Jewish.

In 1964 the Civil Rights Act was passed. 

Then came the Vietnam War, plus a military draft.  Blacks comprised about 12% of the U.S. population, but comprised more than 12% of the drafted soldiers.

“Thanks, but we’ll take it from here”

With the Vietnam War came the rise of Black Power, which emphasized self-reliance.  Blacks entered colleges as students and teachers, and felt they were as good as Jews when it came to studying the Black experience.

Blacks also felt they should control their own organizations.  They expelled Jews from SNCC, CORE, and other Black groups. (Jews continued to control the NAACP.)

And so, sixty sixty years after Blacks and Zionists formed a partnership for their mutual advantage, Blacks told Jews, “Thanks for everything, but we’ll take it from here.”

Naturally the Jews vowed revenge.

In 1967, the Six Day War showed Israel that it could get away with anything, including the murder of U.S. personnel (the USS Liberty).  Suddenly Jews discovered the holocaust.  Suddenly they all flaunted their own names (rather than adopt Gentile names so they could fit in.)  Suddenly AIPAC exploded in size.  Suddenly the ADL stopped pushing for equal rights, and started to conduct witch-hunts for “anti-Semitism.”  Suddenly Jews took control of Gaza and the West Bank.

Meanwhile Jews retaliated against Black “treachery.”  In 1968, they defeated the efforts of Brooklyn Blacks to control the education of their own children (the Ocean Hill-Brownsville affair). 

In 1977, major Jewish organizations intruded themselves as “friends of the court” into the Bakke case to defeat affirmative action.  Gentile Whites applauded this, refusing to see that Jews practice their own affirmative action by hiring other Jews, and by giving preferences to Jews who apply to universities.  

In 1976, Jimmy Carter became President, and made Andrew Young his U.N. ambassador.  When Young met with a PLO representative in an attempt to broker peace, Jews forced Carter to fire him. 

This further increased the split between Blacks and Jews. 

In 1979, Black Organizations held a summit meeting to condemn the treatment of Andrew Young.  The result was a “Declaration of Independence” against external (i.e. Jewish) control of Black organizations.  That same year, the overthrow of the Shah in Iran eclipsed the war between Blacks and Jews, but friction continued “underground.”

In the 1980 Presidential election, Jews withdrew their support from Carter and gave it to Reagan, whose “anti-crime” (i.e., anti-Black) rhetoric appealed to Jews.  Hence Carter was not re-elected.

Meanwhile a writer named Arthur Jensen claimed that Blacks are genetically inferior in Commentary magazine (published by the American Jewish Committee, a Zionist group). 

Blacks protested, but Commentary said Jensen was protected by the First Amendment. (Of course, negative statements about Jews or Israel are not protected.  Nor is any questioning of the so-called holocaust.)

About this time, Blacks discovered the Talmud, plus the Jewish myth of Hamm, which says that Blacks are cursed for all eternity.  Jews say God hated Africans so much that God made them black and ugly, endowed them with thick lips, big red eyes, kinky hair, and elongated penises.  God said Africans would forever be slaves (”hewers of wood and drawers of water”). 

The Talmud helped spur the rise of the Black Muslims.  Blacks were tired of being told that they were nothing without Jewish support. 

Meanwhile Jews pretended to ally with Whites against Blacks, and became so skilled that even today, some Nazi groups continue to vilify Blacks as well as Jews.  (These groups forget that Hitler was only opposed to Bolshevism and Jewish control, which is why Hitler allowed British troops to escape at Dunkirk, for example.  He wanted to show he was not opposed to the British people.  Of course, history books regard the Dunkirk incident as a “mystery.”  Any event that involves Jews in a negative way is a “mystery.”  People who examine these “mysteries” are “anti-Semitic.”)  

In 1990, professor Michael Levin of the Jewish City College in New York said, “On average, blacks are significantly less intelligent than whites.”  (New York Times, April 20, 1990) 

Again Blacks protested.  Again Jews said the First Amendment protected Levin’s views.

Also in 1990, Nelson Mandela visited New York, at a time when South African apartheid was under a lot of pressure.  Jewish elements threatened to disrupt Mandela’s appearances.

Ted Koppel and other Jews on ABC’s Nightline program hinted that Mandela risked losing U.S. support if Mandela did not bow to Jewish pressure.

In the early 1990s, Jews withdrew most of their financing from the NAACP.  They also prevented Jesse Jackson from becoming president of the NAACP in 1993.  (Jews had also checkmated both of Jackson’s bids to become U.S. President.)

By 1999, the NAACP was forced to cut its staff down to 50 people.  However, its National Voter Fund launched a major offensive in 2000 that caused about 10.5 million Blacks to vote against W. Bush.  Therefore Bush became the first U.S. President in almost seventy years to decline an invitation to speak at the NAACP.

In October 2004, the Internal Revenue Service challenged the NAACP’s tax-exempt status.  Reason: president Julian Bond had criticized W. Bush at an NAACP Convention. 

When the Iraq War became a fiasco, Bush had to look for all the support he could get.  Therefore the IRS backed off from the NAACP, while Bush spoke at an NAACP convention for the first time, hoping to get Black support for Republicans.

Then came Hurricane Katrina, which allowed Jews (Michael Cherotff, et al) to take their final revenge against Blacks.

Tony Martin drops a bombshell

Martin is a professor of history at Wellesley College (which was Hillary Clinton’s alma mater). 

In 1993 he published a book titled The Secret Relationship between Blacks and Jews.  Martin used Jewish documents to show that Jews were intimately involved in all aspects of the African slave trade. 

Naturally this caused an explosion.  It was all right to discuss the role of Christians, Muslims, and African collaborators, but the central role played by Jews could not be discussed.

Martin explains that Jews were major slave importers and dealers in places such as Barabados, and at Curaçao (Brazil).  Jews were heavily invested in the Dutch West India Company: a multinational corporation that specialized in the slave trade.  Jews owned large numbers of slaves in the Jewish-dominated town of Jew Savannah (Surinam) and elsewhere.  Jews (like their Christian counterparts) perpetrated all manner of atrocities against Africans, from whipping to dismembering to rape and murder.

Jewish abolitionists were rare.  The few who spoke out were silenced by other Jews. There was no Jewish counterpart to the organized Christian abolitionism of the Quakers, Methodists, Baptists and others.
 
U.S. census figures showed that Jews owned more slaves per capita than Gentiles did.  Jews also owned slave ships that plied the Atlantic.  They also owned all the rum distilleries in Newport, Rhode Island.  (Rum, distilled from slave-produced molasses, was an important item in the slave trade.)

Of course, no one would print Martin’s book, since Jews own most publishing firms in the USA.  Therefore Martin went to the Nation of Islam (Black Muslims), which has its own publishing firm. 

The ADL went on the warpath, as did Hillel, an interstate organization of militant Zionists on school campuses.

At Wellesley College, professor Mary Lefkowitz published false statements in Measure magazine, alleging that Martin called a white student a fucking white bitch.  “The young woman fell down as a result of his onslaught,” Lefkowitz wrote, “and Martin bent over to continue his rage at her.”

Martin sued for libel.  The ADL intervened, and got the judge to throw out Martin’s case.  Martin appealed, and eventually forced Lefkowitz to admit she had lied.

Lefkowitz then started writing op-ed pieces against Martin in the Wall Street Journal, the Chronicle of Higher Education, the New Republic and other Zionist-controlled publications. 

Her attacks culminated in a book titled, Not Out of Africa: How Afrocentrism Became an Excuse to Teach Myth as History.  The book was heavily promoted in the New York Times, on National Public Radio, and elsewhere.

Martin responded in his own book, The Jewish Onslaught: Dispatches from the Wellesley Battlefront (1993) which discusses all the dirty tricks that Zionists have used against him and many others.

In 1994, Wellesley’s president, Diana Walsh, denied Martin a merit pay increase, citing “The recent degradation of your scholarship.”  Ms. Walsh said Martin’s books violate the basic principles of the norms of civil discourse.  (“Civil discourse” means not questioning Jewish Supremacism.)

Meanwhile at Wellesley, Martin had taught for 25 years, but suddenly his classes were no longer cross-linked. This meant that Wellesley students could not get any credits by taking Martin’s courses.

In 1998 the chair of Africana Studies was about to rotate back to Martin.  For the first time in the department’s twenty-five year history, the normal rotation was interrupted. The dean of the history college, Nancy Kolodny (Jew) summoned members of the department to explain why Martin was denied the chair.  The department’s two other senior members, Judy Rollins (Jew) and Selwyn Cudjoe agreed. 

(Back in 1975, Selwyn Cudjoe had written in the Trinidad Guardian that, “Zionism is racist, colonial and perforce expansionist.  It constitutes an intolerable and repulsive ideological position that is detrimental to peace in the world.  It must be equated with South African apartheid.”  Now Cudjoe attacked Martin.)

Martin was invited to give lectures at many universities, but was protested wherever he went. 

He also received many death threats.  A Jew named Alexander Nechaevsky issued threats against Martin on the Wellesley campus.  Police arrested the man.  According to the police report, Nechaevsky said he had come to “get” Professor Tony Martin.  Nechaevsky said he was no wimp, and was from Russia, where they knew how to take care of business.  Police found him talking with Professor Larry Rosenwald of the English Department, and arrested him.  In court he was charged with issuing death threats, but once again the ADL intervened.  Attorney Sally Greenberg got Nechaevsky off.

Back at Wellesley College, Lefkowitz got another Jew (a European Classical scholar) to deny multicultural credit to courses taught by Martin.  Lefkowitz also demanded that Wellesley drop all of Martin’s courses.  Her attacks became so blatant that Wellesley’s silent majority finally became embarrassed at its own cowardice, and overturned Lefkowitz.

Mainstream Blacks supported Martin, but academic Blacks ran for cover.  Blacks at Zionist-controlled colleges were forced to attack Martin.  For example, Henry Louis Gates, Jr. (Chair of the African American Studies Department at Harvard) signed his name to a full-page ad in the New York Times that condemned Martin’s books.  The words were typeset to form a star of David. Martin says Jews wrote and paid for the ad.  He refers to Gates as a textbook “HNIC” (Head-Nigger-In-Charge).

Martin says Jews control most campus newspapers.  Whenever he is scheduled to give a guest lecture at various schools, campus newspapers blast him for several days before and after.  (The same thing happens to people like Tony Judt and Norman Finkelstein.)

You can read Martin’s accounts of the protests against him here. Some of these accounts are comical. 

For example, when Martin was scheduled to speak at Worcester State College in Massachusetts, the mayor of Worcester called a press conference to denounce Martin.  As the cameras rolled, the mayor paraded all the religious leaders he could muster on short notice.  (Catholic, Protestant, Baptist, and Jewish people).  The front-page photo in the city’s largest paper even showed a Black “leader” or two, plus a top official of the local NAACP. 

Meanwhile the president of Worcester State College wrote the Massachusetts attorney general’s office, asking if there was any legal way to prevent Martin from speaking, or to impound Martin’s honorarium (speaking fee).  The attorney general said no.

The morning of the February lecture was bitterly cold, but a dozen people showed up to picket outside.  Martin felt so awful for his attackers that he wanted to invite them inside to warm up, but campus security overruled him.

Tony Martin’s own web site is here, but it’s not particularly juicy. 

Conclusion

This blogger feels that the split between Blacks and Jews happened for three reasons…

1. After the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Blacks called for self-sufficiency.  (“We’ll take it from here.”)  For Jews who supported (and exploited) them, this was an act of rebellion.

2. The Vietnam War, which drove the USA into madness.

3. Jewish militancy.

In a sense, the current madness of Bush is an extension of the madness of Vietnam.  After 9-11, Americans decided it was okay to ”kick ass” again.  And Zionist Jews have been behind them all the way.    

6 Comments

  1. Jesus Reyes said,

    I think one of the main reason that Jews bailed from the Black movement was that the Black Panthers began to discover the Palestinians as another oppressed people. Eldridge Cleaver jumped bail to Algeria and Malcolm X went on the haj.

    This is really played into the shut down of the antiwar movt because, of course, oppressed people was what that was was all about.

    Both movt were beginning to focus on the Palestinians and 1967 put them on the front page. In 1967 Bob Dylan put out “John Wesley Harding” and the 3rd from last song was the last protest song. The music died.

    Irving Kristol said “a conservative is a liberal mugged by reality”. He never named that reality. This is it.

    Excellent comment, Jesus. I know that during the 1960s, Blacks suddenly “discovered” Palestinians, but I haven’t seen any historical analyses of this. Was there a relationship between the Palestinian resistance and Black Power groups such as the Symbionese Liberation Army? Was there a relationship between Siran Sirhan (the Palestinian who assassinated Robert F. Kennedy) and Black or Palestinian or Israeli groups? And so on.

    Thanks for commenting.–AG

  2. dlb said,

    Also, a Jew didn’t put the top back on my toothpaste. I;m not 100% sure. But you know how they are.

    I appreciate your sarcasm. Despite this blog’s endless comments about “Jews this” and “Jews that,” and blah, blah, blah, the real target is war, and Zionism’s role is promoting it. Zionism is not the only culprit. War-profiteering corporations are as much to blame. This blogger wants the slaughter of Palstinians and the war in Iraq to end, that’s all.

    Thanks for your comment.–AG

  3. Chris Womak said,

    Great article, please add my link to your links list.

    http://pcapostate.blogspot.com

  4. The Great Revealer said,

    The Self-Stylized FAKE “jews” are not semitic.

    They are WHITE AhskeNAZI KhaZars. White people are NOT black, they are NOT Asian, they are not Native/Aboriginal, they are NOT East Indian, they are NOT Oriental, they are NOT Ay-rab (aka Arab),…………….

    ………… they are White.

    White AshkeNAZI KhaZars

    White….

    not black….

    not Arab…..

    not Semitic (i.e. sub-population of Arabs)…..

    not Asian……

    not Indian…..

    not Aboriginal…..

    not Oriental……

    In my post titled “A Man Of Peace,” I speculated that since Muslims and Semitic Jews came from the same root, and are not natural enemies, there would have been no problems in Palestine if the Khazars had not invaded. Khazars are alien. They even hate Sephardic Jews, Ethiopian Jews, and so on.

    Thanks for commenting.–AG
    Thanks for reading anf for commenting.–AG

  5. Fatisma said,

    I love reading stuff like this because it makes the KKK seem justified. Perhaps they were really a civil rights group who stood up to violent blacks. Perhaps the media has let blacks demonize the good guys. It kind of seems like that considering that anywhere in the world you go blacks are violent and disproportionately involved in crime. I lived in Argentina and Egypt for years and even in these two places it is true. I’m beginning to think the KKK was right.

  6. James said,

    Fatisma your racist big time, I’m beginning to the the KKK was right. So only black people are violent when Dr. Martin Luther King was marching he was preaching non violent. So when the KKK hangs a black man or drags man until his eyes pop out thats violent. You need to get your facts straight next time.

Post a Comment