AGAINST ZIONISM

This is just a quick (and somewhat rambling) comment…

Zionists are only part of the problem.  Throughout history, the Jewish practice has been to invade a host and establish a place between the upper crust of society and its mainstream population.  Iraq was invaded so the upper crust could steal its oil.  Afghanistan was invaded in order to surround Iran (which also has oil), and to bump up the heroin trade, and secure territory for future pipelines out of Iran and northwest Asia. 

The upper crust requires absolute obedience from the masses. If they order the masses to die, they need those orders followed without question.  That’s where Zionist Jews come in.  Zionists own all the media outlets, and attack anyone who speaks too plainly.  They own the courts, the banks, the universities, the medical clinics, and so on.  They are the gatekeepers, the buffer between the upper crust and the masses.  Since they are psychotic, they make excellent guard dogs.  The upper crust rewards them for this duty by allowing them to become wealthy, and by giving them all they demand, including unconditional support for Israeli atrocities. 

 Meanwhile in Israel, politicians can only stay in power if they have constant war and “anti-Semitism.”  Thus, the war in Iraq serves their needs too.  Iraq was invaded for both oil and Israel; for both the upper crust and the Jews.

Jews tend to hire Jews, which serves the upper crust, since it allows Jews to form a barrier that keeps the masses down.  If Jews threaten the upper crust, they will be expelled.

Jews are superb gatekeepers. They have saturated the western mind with their alleged “victimhood” to the extent that even anti-Zionists are often careful not to condemn all Jews.  I’ve seen anti-Zionists hesitate to question the holo-hoax. 

To me, any Jew that does not publicly condemn Zionism is suspect, even though I know thatsome of them are afraid to speak out.  I do not talk with them, or associate with them personally.  If I can possibly avoid it, I will not buy from them, or patronize a Jewish doctor, or share the same physical room in a public area. I am not obsessed – I simply shun them if possible.

Some of you live in areas that have racial tension, and resent illegal aliens.  These groups are merely competitors.  They want to succeed.  For Jews, it is not enough that Jews succeed.  They must also keep you down.

Gentile lords and Jewish moneylenders with their “free trade” have wiped out what little livelihood there was in Mexico.  They forced Mexicans to invade the USA. 

I’ve been to Mexico many times, and I speak Spanish.  People only leave if they have no choice.  Jewish moneychangers have infested Mexico too. They control Argentina.  They have made significant inroads in Asia, especially China, which they hope will become their new host if America fails them. 

Their strategy never varies.  (1) Invade (2) centralize all production and banking (3) serve the upper crust as gatekeepers (4) suck from the masses. 

The upper crust doesn’t care if Jews crash the system and buy everything for pennies, since the upper crust is not affected.  If they are affected, they expel all Jews.

As I said, this is just a quick comment.

Exactly where did the Iranian-British incident occur?

(A very sick satire–but no more so than the sickness of Zionism)

Water covers three fourths of the earth’s surface, but only three percent of the total is fresh water. Of that, only one percent is accessible, with the remainder being frozen in the polar ice caps.

Thus, only one percent of all the earth’s water is available for man’s use.

This factor is especially felt in Israel, where diminishing water resources is  a crisis as severe as any our democracy has ever faced, with the exception of anti-Semitism.

The problem affects more than drinking and bathing, since three fourths of all water is used to produce food. For example, about 1000 gallons of water are needed to grow the wheat to make a two-pound loaf of bread.  Over 120 gallons are consumed in producing one egg. Meanwhile evaporation causes an acre of corn to lose 4000 gallons of water each day.

Even clothing is “drying up.” About 1800 gallons of water are needed to produce the cotton in a pair of jeans sold in a Tel Aviv shopping mall, and 400 gallons to produce the cotton in a shirt.

Thus, water shortages affect all aspects of Israeli life, and are felt in the most intimate ways.

“Water makes up two-thirds of the human body, and seventy percent of the brain,” notes Dr. Mordecai Levy of the Mt. Zion Medical Institute. “When we multiply body weight in pounds by two-thirds, and divide the result by 8.34 pounds (the weight of one gallon of water) we see that the average180-pound man carries over 14 gallons of water in his body. If we multiply those 14 gallons by Palestinian casualties caused by terrorism, we calculate that the intifada is depriving Israel of about forty million gallons of water each month through Palestinian burial of their casualties. Thus, by dint of sheer mathematics, Muslim burial is yet another form of anti-Semitism.”

Indeed, Levy regards this as asymmetrical terrorism. “Palestinians know, or should have known, that the water supply on earth is always constant. There is never one drop more or less. In this cycle of circular infinity, of a planet birthing itself, the Palestinians are seeking to destroy a divine system that benefits everyone.  To defeat this attack, we were looking for some means to convert corpses into fluid in order to extract the life-giving water within.”

Enter Menachim Goldwater of Zion Industries, a market leader in public services. Using specially modified wood chippers, Zion’s  “water wizards” render bodies into pulp throughout Gaza and the West Bank.  However this is only the first step in a process of separating the precious fluid from its anti-Semitic vehicles.

“The government was skeptical at first,” Goldwater says, “since Israel was chosen to be holy in an unclean world, and anything extracted from Palestinians is chazir-treif (non-kosher). However, since the earth purifies all things, especially in Israel, leading rabbis decided that water used to irrigate crops is in fact kashrut. Meanwhile the non-Orthodox population became enthusiastic when they learned that our final product contains nothing but hydrogen and oxygen. The entire process has spiritual significance. If there is magic on this planet, it is contained in water.”

According to Goldwater, extracted pulp is transferred to water trucks that are driven to a large facility. There the harvest is boiled, electrified, exposed to ultraviolet light, squeezed through a series of mesh screens, and put through reverse osmosis. Then the process is repeated thirty more times with each batch.

“The energy costs are severe,” Goldwater explains. “Therefore solid matter, once separated, is compressed into blocks that are sawed into manageable size and shipped to the Plotke Plant in Haifa, where they serve as excellent fuel to run generators. We expect to be electrically self-sufficient soon.”

The IDF has found a bonus in this approach. “Palestinians are accustomed to the usual means of counter-terrorism,” says Colonel Chaim Dicter of the Fourth Armored Brigade, “but when a Blue Meany is wheeled into their neighborhoods, its roar makes terrorists burst into tears.  They try to protect their young, thereby exposing themselves and allowing our brave snipers to do their job. Afterward the bodies are rendered into pulp. We’re proud to say nothing is wasted.”

Colonel Dicter stresses that the IDF does not throw live children into the harvesters. “We did that for a while, just to make a point,” he explains, “but we seldom resort to it now, since harvesters make quite a splash, and our soldiers become defiled.”

What about wounded children? Are they thrown in?

“I doubt they feel anything,” Dicter said.

Dr. Levy qualifies that statement. “The pain is negligible if children are harvested correctly.  Based on what I’ve seen, IDF troops could use more training in the ethical use of state equipment.”

The following pictorial explains some of the process whereby Palestinians and Israelis are now working together to solve a problem that affects all of Israel.

Invictus by Sarah Silverschitz was awarded the Best-of-Show in Harvard’s competitive all-campus art exhibition.

Each year the university selects one work for inclusion in its permanent art collection. The winning artist is offered a full scholarship to his or her choice of any graduate college at Harvard.

Ms. Silverschitz won by taking an ordinary print and “evolving” it to timeless power, poignancy, and simplicity. Her brilliance lay in the fact that she mixed the blue paint herself, and used a butcher knife brought by her grandmother from a ghetto in Poland.

“The knife has dried blood on it,” Silverschitz said, “from a time when my family butchered thousands of lambs as religious offerings. Hence the lamb in the scene. The work takes a Deconstructionist approach to Christian patriarchy, and re-interprets anti-Semitism through a Lacanian lens, while questioning its milieu throuigh a close reading of Freudian semiotics.”

The judges’ criteria included novelty, ethical import, and aesthetic appeal.  In this context, panelist Ari Rosenthal singled out Ms. Silverschitz for special praise. “With one stroke she has revolutionized Western art, while creating political impact through her depiction of a figure in Israel. All other entries were meticulously painted by accomplished artists, some of them already famous in China and elsewhere.  Ms. Silverman was the only contestant who never did anything artistic before this . That gives her masterpiece a freshness we haven’t seen in years.”

Several members of the judging panel felt that other works were potentially as powerful,  but judges reached a unanimous decision when contestants gave their oral presentations.

“Sarah  got up there and announced that she doesn’t intend to become an attorney at all,” Rosenthal added.  “She simply wanted the scholarship because a Harvard Law degree looks good on a resume.  Given her emphasis on cultural criticism, we couldn’t help but be impressed with the irony of her bold comment.  Her confidence and wry haughtiness were irresistable.”

Several competitors protested when they discovered that Silverschitz used a common print obtained from Wal-Mart ®. One envious rival complained that, “Any child could have done that.”

“That’s the point,” Rosenthal countered. “By appropriating an icon of Western heritage, Sarah made a profound statement regarding modern consumerist culture. And since the print was manufactured in China, her concept is nothing less than a global triumph.”

Another student claimed that Ms. Silverschitz only won because she is Jewish;  otherwise she would not have been allowed to enter the show in the first place. The student was immediately expelled, and now faces a lawsuit brought by the Anti-Defecation League.

Ms. Silverschitz will begin law school in the fall of 2007. Money for the scholarship (worth $479,000) will come from the General Fund for the State of Massachusetts.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

This image is dedicatd to QRSWAVE at Wake Up From Your Slumber …